SEARCH

A system outcome is an emergent property that for compliance may be greater safety, quality, security

trust, and realizing the benefits from being in compliance: better safety, security, sustainability, quality

address within a compliance program and across the entire portfolio (safety, security, sustainability, quality

However, when it comes to keeping compliance promises associated with quality of service, impact on the

tactical) along with specific risks associated with safety, security, sustainability, environmental, quality

These obligations are focused on maintaining a consistent level of performance or quality over time. information on the tools and equipment required, the sequence of steps to be followed, and any safety or quality Qualitative Risk Assessmen t: This method uses subjective judgment and expert opinions to assess risks identifying areas for improvement, and implementing changes to increase efficiency, reduce waste, and improve quality reducing waste and increasing efficiency, while Six Sigma focuses on reducing defects and improving quality

So I would begin with the directors of quality, safety, environmental, and regulatory programs.

Instead of defects (or poor quality) as the effects of variation, compliance focuses on non-conformance mandate for lean practitioners working in compliance domains including environmental, safety, security, quality

to recruit and retain staff—a business with a reputation for compliance is likely to attract higher‑quality of non‑compliance; triggering early warnings of potentially illegal conduct; allowing a business to qualify

given to: Standard work Process consistency Inspections and audits Corrective actions Systems (safety, quality

for anyone who is responsible for the creation of outcomes related to regulatory, safety, security, quality

This applies to safety, quality, environmental and regulatory objectives.